DIY Baby Wipes, Save $$$

Anyone who has a baby knows that the cost of baby wipes really adds up after a while. Most people think they can only buy them in the store, but actually you can DIY them and it's probably even easier than you'd think. Watch this video to find out how to make your own. This simple trick could save you hundreds of dollars each year!

Jesus VS. Muhammad

Jesus, a servant, never fought in battle, never killed a guy! Not only did Muhammad do so, but he actually felt that it was his divine calling to KILL non-Muslims and MURDER people who insulted him!”

This is the one, folks. This is the video that’s literally resulted in an official fatwa and literally thousands of threats on my life and that of my family.

Here is a telling Jesus vs Muhammad comparison. While it would be simpler to declare that there is no comparison between Jesus and Muhammad, in many ways, as shown below, Jesus was the antithesis of Muhammad, or Muhammad the antithesis of Jesus. (The evidences for Jesus' and Muhammad's columns are footnoted below and linked, respectively.)

     JESUS                                                                               MUHAMMAD

Jesus’ name means God is Savior, Immanuel-God with us as our Savior.	Mohammed's name means praised one
Born about 4 BC. in Bethlehem Born of the Virgin Mary Isa.7:14 had no earthly father, Mt.1but conceived of the Holy Spirit.	Born of Aminah In 570 A.D. in Mecca
Raised by Mary His mother and Joseph, His adopted father .	Raised by his mother, Halima the nurse, then his uncle and grandfather
Prophesied by more than 300 scriptures for his first coming, fulfilled them all including Deut.18:15.	Muslims believe Mohammed is prophesied as the Comforter. And the prophet of Deut.18:15
Labored as a carpenter like his stepfather in Nazareth	His father was named Abd Allah after Allah. Started as a shepherd then became a camel-caravan leader
Spoke in Hebrew, Aramaic, and probably Greek	Spoke only Arabic, Muslims say he was illiterate
Was literate, but wrote no books. He directly commissioned his dedicated followers  to write and preach His message. The Holy Spirit inspired them.	Was literate;  an angel called Gabriel delivered the message. Wrote the Quran or as some say others heard his sayings and wrote them down as well.
Attracted multitudes by His teaching of God affirming the OT. Taught openly to multitudes as one having authority	Attracted multitudes by his teaching and by the sword forcefully overthrowing the worship of multiple Gods.
Miracles and healing’s were given freely, he healed all kinds of diseases.	The Koran is his miracle. Did no miracles of healing or delivering people from demons.
Moved to Capernaum because of rejection by His townspeople and brothers and sisters	Had to move to Medina because of rejection by his townspeople
Was never married nor lusted for a woman	Married to at least fifteen wives one of which was only 9 years old at the time.
Lived a sinless life, never once prayed for forgiveness like other sinners, he forgave others.	Prayed often for forgiveness of his sins as did all the prophets in the Old Testament and New Testament .
Waged no war, said his kingdom was not of this world so his followers should not fight. Jesus said those who live by the sword will die by the sword.	Mohammed was a warrior who waged war numerous holy wars (Jihad) against infidels and pagans. Fighting or leading in sixty-six battles to spread his message of monotheism
Ordered the death of no one but instead died in place of the guilty murderer and all who have sinned.	Ordered the death of many men and women (the first was a poetess) to promote the message of monotheism among the pagans.
Established a religion of truth, mercy and love even for enemies, invites all to come to Him.	Established a monotheistic belief system, an earthly empire teaching all must obey the teachings of the Koran.
Established a relationship with God and a spiritual kingdom not of this world that will last forever with him as the ruler.	Established a religion of God being compassionate and merciful  to the obedient but there are no guarantees for anyone.
Died by crucifixion in place of others in Jerusalem at age 33 being totally innocent of any crime.	Died in Medina due to effects of pneumonia at age 62
Arose from the dead the third day just like he predicted, emptying His tomb, promises to raise everyone else and judge them.	Still lingers in his grave awaiting the Day of Judgment by Jesus.
The Bible inspires people to seek peace and the Gospel is called the Gospel of peace. The God of the Bible offers His love gives us a choice to choose. He does not want anyone to perish in their sins.	The Qu'ran condones fighting for God and the cause of Islam when necessary.  It promotes genocide death to infidels and pagans and those who do not accept Islam when it is offered.
Jesus is mentioned in the Quran 97 times	Mohammed is mentioned in the Qu'ran 25 times
Jesus is mentioned hundreds of times in the Bible	Mohammed is mentioned not once in the Bible
Jesus is called a prophet, priest and King (king of all Kings)	Mohammed is called an apostle in the Qu'ran and a prophet in Islam
Old Testament predicts His 2nd coming in more Scriptures than his first, which are 600 detailed accounts.	Mohammed had only one self fulfilling prophecy, nothing in the Old Testament predicted his coming.
Over 1,500,000,000 claim to be His followers are known for their dedication, love, and caring for others. Building hospitals feeding the poor and helping to educate people all over the world showing the compassion of the God they serve.	1 billion are followers who are dedicated, zealous and still use force if necessary against non Muslims in their land where Islam is the countries religion.
Christ prophesied of the end of the age and what it would be like when He comes again. He will save Israel from her enemies. The Old and  New Testament prophecies will be fulfilled by his 2nd coming.	There is no teaching on Mohammed coming back again to rule or reign. Islam actually teaches Christ is coming back.

		JESUS	MUHAMMAD
Identity		Creator 1	Creature
Claimed to be		God 2 & Son of God 2	Prophet
Since		The beginning 2	He told his wife Khadija about hearing voices and she told him they must be of an angel and he must be a prophet
Claim is		Proven by His resurrection	Disproven by his false prophecies
Raised		The dead to life 3	An army to put many to death
Lied to		None	Many (see Taqiyya)
Mistook		None	Satan's voice as Allah's
Robbed		None	Many
Forgave		Everyone	None who offended
Healed		Thousands	None
Killed		None	Thousands (see Religion of Peace)
Walked on		Water 4	Blood of those he slaughtered
Wives permitted		0-1	Up to 4 (see Naskh)
His wives		0	12+
Youngest wife		n/a	6 year old Ai'sha, the 'marriage' to whom Muhammad consummated when she was 9 years old and he was 53 years old
Said of the other		Warned about his kind 5	Praised Jesus
Sinned		Never 6	Constantly
Epitomized		Love	Violence
Sacrificed		Himself to save others	Others to save himself
Presently in		Heaven	Hell

the difference between muhammad and jesus

the difference between jesus and mohammed

was mohammed real

is there proof of muhammad

muhammad in christianity

who came first jesus or muhammad

compare and contrast jesus/muhammad's family life

jesus vs muhammad comparison

Simonuz1965 EBay Con-Artist

The Ebay user name  simonuz1965 is a fraud and is trying to trick people on Ebay. He is buying items, claiming that they are not as described. Demanding a refund. Then he re-sells them under his Ebay account. 

This Con artist uses an email simonuz@gmail.com

His name is Simon Uziel from Israel

Please be aware and if you run into any trouble, Contact Ebay 1-866-540-3229

To put a name to his face. Below is a picture of this con-artist. 

 


Suck My Balls,  Simon Uziel 

Judge Says Facebook Must Face Class Action Lawsuit Over Message Scanning

Facebook must face a class action lawsuit filed in California claiming the social networking site sifted through users’ private messages for targeted advertising purposes, violating both federal and state law.

Lead plaintiff Matthew Campbell and two others sued Facebook in December 2013, alleging the company scanned user messages for web links, translating them to “likes” on the user’s Facebook profile. Data lifted from the private messages was then used for targeted advertising, the plaintiffs claimed.

“Facebook’s practice of scanning the content of these messages violates the federal Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA also referred to as the Wiretap Act), as well as California’s Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA), and section 17200 of California’s Business and Professions Code,” the plaintiffs said.

On Tuesday, US District Judge Phyllis Hamilton denied Facebook’s motion to dismiss the ECPA and CIPA section 631 claims, while granting dismissal of claims pertaining to section 632 of the CIPA and section 17200 of the CaliforniaBusiness & Professions Code, according to Tech Times.

Facebook “has not offered a sufficient explanation of how the challenged practice falls within the ordinary course of itsbusiness,” Judge Hamilton said.

The court said Facebook’s terms of service is too vague to surmise whether users ultimately consented to the company’s scan of their private messages for advertising uses.

Plaintiffs said they have a reasonable expectation of privacy within their user-to-user messaging.

Though it said it stopped the practice in question in late 2012, Facebook said in an October motion hearing, accordingto Courthouse News, that it has the right to analyze user messages, as it still does to some degree protect against viruses and helps filter out spam.

“The fact that Facebook can configure its code to scan message content for certain purposes, but not for others, leaves open the possibility that the challenged practice constitutes a separate ‘interception,’” Judge Hamilton wrote on Tuesday.

“Facebook moves to strike plaintiffs’ request for injunctive relief, arguing that it ceased the challenged practice ‘nearly two years ago,‘” Hamilton wrote. “However, plaintiffs have adequately alleged that there is a ‘sufficient likelihood’ that Facebook could resume the practice, so the court denies Facebook’s request to strike the injunctive relief at this time.”

Neither Facebook nor attorneys for the plaintiffs responded to Reuters’ immediate request for comment.

In addition to Facebook, Yahoo! and Earthlink have faced similar lawsuits. Google’s Gmail is currently appealing accusations that it violated the Wiretap Act as it scanned Gmail messages for targeted-ad purposes.

Meanwhile, in Europe, Facebook is fighting off a class action lawsuit filed in August, which claims Facebook violated users’ privacy by cooperating with the National Security Agency’s PRISM surveillance program.

CACA, Unlock the Secrets of Your Poop

Talking about poop isn’t the most pleasant subject in the world, but the fact of the matter is that that what you deposit in your toilet can tell you much about what’s going on inside your body.

Time you gave a sh*t about your poop

Our bodies are complex organisms, and there’s a lot that can go wrong with them. Running a temperature, pain, fatigue, and depression are all clear signs that there’s trouble afoot, and your poop is another sign, that, but did you know how to read it, could give you an early warning that all is not well. So if you don’t give a sh*t about your poop, you’re passing up a great opportunity of diagnosing any potential problems, and taking the advantage that early treatment of any condition or disease can bring.

Creating your own pooposcope

Reading the tea leaves or the coffee grounds might give you some insight into what’s in store for you; but then again it might not. Reading your poop however, will. So let’s get down to business and set about telling you how you can read your own pooposcope.

The Bristol Stool Chart

The color of your stools (posh word), their consistency, their size, and their smell are all tell-tale signs of certain aspects of your internal health. As we go through the motions (little hidden pun there) of teaching you what to look for when you examine your poop, we’ll make use of something called the “Bristol Stool Chart”. It’s something that researchers at the Bristol Royal Infirmary in the UK came up with, it will help us to categorize the different types of poop and explain what each means.

The Perfect Poop

Who would have thought that finding the perfect poop could make you happy; but it should. It’s a sign that all is well on the inside. This is what the average stool consists of:

Water (approx 75%)
Solid matter (approx 25%)
The so-called solid matter can be broken down into:

Dead bacteria
Indigestible food matter (fiber and cellulose)
Cholesterol
Other fatty substances
The exact make-up and appearance of your stools will vary to a certain degree, according to what you have eaten and drunk. It normally takes somewhere between 18 and 72 hours to digest food and create poop. In an ideal world, (and now referring to the Bristol Stool Chart), the closer your stools are to types 3, 4, and 5, (4 & 5 being the ppp – the pinnacle of poop perfection), the better. When you have diarrhea, it’s because you’re stools have been processed to quickly and your intestines haven’t had time to extract as much water as they normally should. At the other end of the scale, failure to produce within 72 hours, is indicative of constipation, which may be linked to other problems.

Stool type # 1 – Small, hard lumpy stools

These types of stools can indicate acute disbacteriosis, which is an inflammation of the small intestine. Because certain bacteria are missing, there is little to be able to retain the water in the stool. These lumps of poop are small, solid, and abrasive, normally being anywhere from 1 to 2 cm in diameter. Because they are solid and somewhat scratchy, they can be quite painful to pass. This can cause anal bleeding. These types of stools are typical for anyone who has undergone a treatment of antibiotics, or anyone on a low fiber, or fiber free diet.

Stool type # 2 – Sausage shaped stools with lumps

This type of stool is actually a quantity of type 1 stools which have impacted into one single stool. They have a diameter of between 3 and 4 cm and often occur through constipation, remaining in the intestinal tract for several weeks. They are difficult and painful to pass, and may cause bleeding in the process, given their solidity, and the fact that their size exceeds that of the anal aperture.

This type of stool is typical for someone suffering from IBS (irritable bowel syndrome).

Stool type # 3 – Sausage shaped stools with a cracked surface

This type of stool is similar to stool number 2, but is processed faster, (typically between one and two weeks) and is therefore also indicative of constipation and irritable bowel syndrome.

Stool type # 4 – Sausage shaped stools, soft and smooth

This type of stool is pretty close to perfection. It is 1 to 2 cm in diameter (which indicates relatively short transit time and good fiber content). It is typical of someone who defecates once per day.

Stool type 5 – Soft blobs of poop with well defined edges

This type of poop is as close as you’ll get to poop perfection. With a diameter of between 1 and 1.5 centimeters, it is typical of someone who defecates two or three times per day following major meals.

Stool Type # 6 – Fluffy stools that have ragged, torn, edges

This type of stool is very soft in texture. It can catch people by surprise and cause problems if a bathroom isn’t close by. It can also be quite difficult to clean with toilet tissue alone. A bidet would be useful. This type of stool indicates highblood pressure, and stress.

Stool type # 7 – Diarrhea type – loose

This is similar to ordinary diarrhea but in this instance is something called paradoxical diarrhea because it happens in conjunction with constipation, accompanying stool type 1. It is often experienced by children and the elderly.

Stool Color

As well as size, shape, and consistency, the color of stools can be quite symptomatic, being an indicator of various conditions. A normal healthy stool, (or one than doesn’t indicate the existence of any problems) is a medium/light brown color.

Black, tar, or bright red colored stools: These are an indication that there may be bleeding in the GI or anal tract, and you are advised to consult your doctor without delay. Please note however that black stools can be experienced from certain medications, various health supplements, and after eating black licorice.
Very pale brown, gray, or white stools: This odd coloration can be caused through a lack of bile, although white stools can also be a result of taking antacids. However, these types of discolored stools may indicate problems such as cirrhosis, hepatitis, and pancreatic illness. These are all serious conditions and you should see your doctor immediately for a check-up.
Yellow colored stools: Yellow colored stools can be an indication of a problem with your gallbladder, a giardia infection, or something known as Gilbert’s syndrome. Yellow stools are a prompt to visit your doctor.
Smelly Stools

No matter which way you dress it up, poop don’t smell nice. But there’s not nice, and then there’s downright nasty smelling poop. Vile smelling stools can be indicative of:

A problem with absorption
Celiac disease
Crohn’s disease
Pancreatitis
Cystic fibrosis
Holistic health covers all aspects of well-being

Knowing how to interpret your stools can actually be a real life saver, so it’s not something you can just pooh-pooh (sorry I couldn’t resist it). I’ve just scratched the surface here in this article, If you like to dig deeper, follow this link to the mercola.com website. They do say that a holistic health lifestyle addresses all aspects of health and being. Well you have to say that learning how to read your own pooposcopes is really taking that sentiment to heart.

Revolutionary Way to ‘Switch off’ Pain Discovered

A breakthrough means to ease pain for millions of patients has been discovered by US researchers – and it’s right inside our body.

Scientists at St. Louis University, Missouri, blocked a pain pathway in rodents using a receptor called A3, which is located in rats’ brains and spinal cords, and acts against intense feelings of discomfort.

The latest study was published in the medical journal, Brain.

A3 is activated by adenosine, a native chemical stimulator, or synthetic drugs, and brings pain relief, or prevents pain.

“It has long been appreciated that harnessing the potent pain-killing effects of adenosine could provide a breakthrough step towards an effective treatment for chronic pain,” Daniela Salvemini, Professor of pharmacological and physiological sciences at the university, said, as quoted by the Daily Mail.

This new method of pain relief could prevent side effects existing in today’s pain-relief drugs: addiction and increasing tolerance. Other issues include “intolerable side effects that result in discontinued use, inadequate pain relief, and diminished quality of life.”

The existing drugs function via certain “pathways”: circuits involving opioid, adrenergic, and calcium channels.

Should the finding prove successful, it could result in the development of breakthrough, non-addictive drugs formillions of pain sufferers.

“Our findings suggest that this goal may be achieved by focusing future work on the A3AR pathway, in particular, as itsactivation provides robust pain reduction across several types of pain,” Salvemini said.

Adenosine is also being examined as an anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer agent.

Why Is The Food Industry Poisoning Us With Trillions of Nanoparticles?

The U.S. food industry is notorious for poisoning the very consumers who drive their multi-billion dollar enterprise, even spending millions against their right to informed consent (truthful GMO labeling). So, is it any wonder that this deregulated and increasingly deranged juggernaut is experimenting on its own customer base by exposing them to trillions of toxic nanoparticles?

A new study published in Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy titled, “Effects of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in human gastric epithelial cells in vitro,” reveals for the first time that the nanoparticle form of the common “whitening” agent known as titanium dioxide is capable of inducing “tumor-like” changes in exposed human cells.[1]

Whereas previous cell research has established that titanium dioxide (TiO2) is cytotoxic (cell damaging),[2] this is the first study of its kind to find exposed cells undergo a ‘phenotypal’ transition from normal to cancerous cell traits, including an increased rate of cell proliferation and a decrease in programmed cell death – hallmark features of precancerous and/or cancerous cells associated with ‘immortalization.’

Owing to the fact that the researchers tested human gastric epithelial cells, a type of stomach cell in direct contact with material we eat, and considering the broad range of drug, personal care and food products nanoparticle TiO2 is commonly used within, the toxicological implications of these findings are deeply concerning.

We Are Already Eating Titanium Dioxide…?

TiO2 is a naturally occurring oxide of titanium, and has a wide range of industrial applications as a “whitening” pigment in plastics, ceramic glazes and paints. It is used in sunscreens as a UV absorbing “sun protection factor,” due to its high refractive index.  Most of our risk of exposure comes from its use in toothpaste, drugs and excipient-heavy supplements as a pill coating, and food products, including even milk (to ‘improve’ appearance and texture).

Indeed, given that TiO2 is found in thousands of consumer products, the odds are that you are already being exposed to a significant quantity of them on a daily basis.  As reported by Everydayhealth.com, “You ingest around 100 trillion nanoparticles every day, researchers at Binghamton University and Cornell University say.”

So, what are some common brands who use it? Nanotitanium is found in products produced by Jello, Nestlé, M&M’s, Mother’s, Mentos, Albertson’s, Hostess and Kool Aid.

Below is a table from the 2012 E Magazine article “Eating Nano” revealing its presence in common U.S. packaged goods.

Is Titanium Dioxide Regulated?

Much like present day radiobiological risk assessments for technologies like mammography were developed long before the discovery of DNA, making it impossible to comprehend their DNA-damaging properties at that time, present day biosafety regulations of TiO2 were determined long before the advent of nanotechnology.  In both cases, the true harms of these technologies were — and still are — greatly underestimated.

As a result of this information gap, TiO2 is currently classified as ‘generally recognized as safe’ (GRAS) by the FDA, regardless of format. Remarkably, the FDA still allows titanium dioxide in sunscreens “at concentrations of up to 25 percent alone and 2 to 25 percent in combination with any proposed Category I sunscreen active ingredient” without considering the toxicity differential of particle size.[3]Considering that concentrations as low as 0.001% by weight have been found to exhibit clear cytotoxicity within exposed cells,[4] the biosafety regulations governing TiO2  are as great as 5 orders of magnitude or higher less stringent than they should be to protect the consumer.

Nanoparticles are so small they are below the threshold of visibility. This is one reason why they are used for sun protection factor, as 100 nanometers or smaller particles will not leave the white pasty appearance on the skin associated with larger particles.  What you can’t see, however, is still there – and in the case of nanotitanium, may slip through the surface layers of our skin into more sensitive tissues, as well as our blood stream. This is also why, if you use sunscreen, you should make sure the ingredients say “non-nanoparticle” when describing titanium dioxide or zinc oxide. And this rule applies to purportedly ‘natural’ brands as well.

Technically, a nanoparticle, also known as a ‘ultrafine particle,’ is a particle that is sized within the nanometer scale: literally, anywhere between 1-100 billionth (nano) of a meter in diameter.  Going up in scale, larger particles are known as ‘fine particles,’ sized between 2,500 and 100 nanometers, and so-called ‘coarse particles’ are sized between 10,000 and 2,500 nanometers.

How ‘Smaller’ Can Indicate A Much Larger

 Problem

Nanotechnology inverts the unsophisticated logic of conventional toxicology risk assessments: namely, that the smaller the amount of something (concentration or size), the less harmful it is. We have seen how this logic has failed with petrochemical-derived chemicals like benzene, considered toxic in the parts-per-trillion range, and endocrine disrupters like bisphenol A and parabens, which exert powerful hormone-mimicking properties that sometimes increase as their concentration decrease. More recently, Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide (glyphosate), was found to exhibit estrogenicity (and concomitant carcinogenicity) in the parts-per-trillion concentration range. There is also the case of so-called ‘low dose’ radioisotopes such as depleted uranium, whose relatively low radiolytic decay relative to gamma-ray emitting plutonium generates the illusion that it is safer (recent researchperformed by the U.S. Army’s own Radiobiological Research Institute indicates these “lower risk” radiation sources cause up to a million-fold more damage than present risk models explain due to a phenomenon known as the photoelectic effect).

In other words, less is not only more, but when it comes to particle size, smaller sizes often convey exponentially higher toxicity than larger ones.

Why Are We Not Being Protected?

So, why isn’t more being done to protect the consumer from the clear and present health threat represented by nanotechnology? Considering that the Food and Drug Administration does exactly that: administers and/or executes the interests of the food and drug manufacturers, we are supplicating to the wrong entity. The FDA is at least consistent by deciding to allow the food industry to govern itself, but what about the food industry’s liability in saturating our food supply with trillions of nanoparticles per serving, without warning the consumer?

According to Tom Philpot, writing for Grist in 2010, “As with GMOs, the strategy seems to be: release into the food supply en masse first; assess risks later (if ever).”

This strategy, while a seemingly successful short-term business model for nanotechnology stakeholders, is utter insanity when one considers the long-term fall out it will have on the industry once millions wake up to the fact they have been treated, once gain, like guinea pigs.

Moreover, as a growing body of peer-reviewed research on the dangers of nanoparticles accumulates, the millions who have already been exposed unknowingly to their ill effects have a legal right to sue for damages.  The food industry’s increasingly nefarious stance towards the very consumers who ensure their continued business defies logic, and indicates just how unethical their business model really is.

There is really only one answer to this problem. As with unlabeled GMOs, the consumer must refuse to consume them, forcing the manufacturers to bow to the holy dollar and reformulate; or, better yet, the ‘consumer’ must learn how to redefine itself entirely by becoming, once again, a producer, one garden (urban, suburban or rural) at a time. By growing and eating whole foods directly from the earth, we eliminate a wide range of health hazards the mass market food industry has built into their disease-promoting business model.